Surgical Wound Classification Documentation for Certified Perioperative Nurse (CNOR)
Included In This Lesson
Outline
Surgical Wound Classification Documentation
Guidelines:
- Accurate documentation of surgical wound classification by OR nurses is one critical element in determining the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs)
- Surgical wound classification is determined via:
- Communication among the surgical team members
- Observation
- Review of the health record
- Surgical wound classification documentation is a component of patient information management. The patient’s health care record is a legal document and must provide an accurate representation of care
- Documentation must adhere to local, state, and federal regulations and facility policies and may also incorporate recommendations from nation professional guidelines
Considerations:
- The wound classification for any procedure is dependent on:
- The procedure performed
- The presence of infection
- Acute inflammation
- Purulence
- Contamination
- major break in sterile technique
Nurse’s role:
- At the end of any procedure, the interdisciplinary team should agree on surgical wound classification.
- Perioperative RN:
- Team communication-Debriefs with the surgical team to confirm surgical wound classification
- Documents the surgical wound classification in the patient’s perioperative health record
- Ensures documentation of surgical wound classification is consistent among different team members and among different patients with similar procedural characteristics
- Utilizes decision tree to consistently and accurately determine surgical wound classification
- AORN Surgical Wound Classification Decision Tree
Pitfalls:
- Discrepancies in the documented surgical wound classification and the actual surgical wound classification can occur due to:
- Lack of resources
- Education, decision tree
- Lack of communication with the surgeons
- Misconceptions regarding surgical wound classification documentation
- “Dirty implies that their sterile technique is impaired
- Lack of resources
- SSIs have the largest range of annual costs of all health care-associated infections at $3.5 billion to $10 billion
- Discrepancy in surgical wound classification documentation can result in a wound being incorrectly reported as a SSI
Examples:
- No wound = No wound classification
- Clean wound = Class I
- Not infected or inflamed
- The result of a non-penetrating, blunt trauma
- No entry into respiratory, alimentary, or GU tract
- Wound primarily closed or drained with closed drainage
- Clean-Contaminated = Class II
- Respiratory, alimentary, or GU tract entered under controlled conditions without evidence of infection or contamination or major break in technique (spillage from GI tract)
- Contaminated = Class III
- Fresh, open, or accidental wounds
- Gross spillage from GI tract
- Acute non-purulent inflammation present
- Major break in sterile technique (unsterile instruments)
- Dirty, Infected = Class IV
- Old wound with retained devitalized tissue
- Gangrene, necrosis
- Existing clinical infection
- Purulence
- Perforated viscera
- Old wound with retained devitalized tissue
- So think about a routine laparoscopic appendectomy. The wound class depends on what the surgeon sees once they get in there. Is it inflamed? Ruptured?
Linchpins (Key Points):
- Team communication to reach agreement on surgical wound classification
- Accurate documentation of surgical wound classification
- Decision tree to facilitate surgical wound classification
- Discrepancies can lead to incorrectly reported SSIs
Transcript
References
- (2021). Improving the accuracy of surgical wound classification documentation. AORN J, 114(6), P10-P12. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13581
- Cahn, J. (2021), Clinical Issues—August 2021. AORN J, 114: 183-191.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13477 - Murphy, L.W. (2023). Preventing surgical site infections. AORN Journal, 117(2), 126-130.
http://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13868 - Williams, K. (2023). Guidelines in practice: Patient information management. AORN
Journal, 117(1), 52-60. http://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13844